Incorrect Thoughts on Trump's Peace Deal

Don't call it a surrender

The foremost plague on the human race today is the budding alliance between the crypto pigs, Arab oil sheiks, and the Zionist regime of Israel and its collaborators elsewhere. All are united in trying to block the social-democratic surge in U.S. politics.

The crypto swine have unlimited funds to intervene in our elections, the better to recruit toadies who will oppose prudent regulation of their industry, a constant threat to world financial stability. Zionist operatives supply the libelous accusations of antisemitism, as they did against Jeremy Corbyn in the U.K. The American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee runs dark money from assorted billionaires and front groups. AIPAC has become so tainted by Israel’s genocidal policies that it is obliged to conceal its aid under cover of anodyne labels and campaigns that ignore Israel entirely.

The Zionists and the Arab participants in Trump’s “Gaza peace plan” (sic), today endorsed by no less than Hillary Clinton, if that isn’t the Kiss of Death I don’t know what is, still beat the drums for further war with Iran. Assorted opportunists among Democrats are on this bandwagon by condemning Trump, in effect, for breaking off hostilities.

Take the “surrender” idea. The word imparts militant legitimacy to Trump’s cockamamie justifications, by lamenting they were not fulfilled. If I brutalize somebody and then stop, is that a “surrender”?

It is true that Trump has walked back from all his idiotic excuses for the war. JD Vance has caved even more forthrightly. Democrats who attack them for that should be boiled in oil.

One such excuse was that Iran could not have nukes. Of course, they don’t have them and weren’t about to get them, Netanyahu’s lies notwithstanding. They have reiterated what they already said when the deal with Obama was made (a deal neglected by Sleepy Joe and Mrs. Clinton). Pakistan and North Korea, regimes no less sketchy than Iran, have had nukes for years. What’s the big deal?

Bibi at the UN, four years ago.

Two was the uranium, in Trump’s words the “nuclear dust.” There was talk of a special ops raid to recover the material. Now DT says that stuff is worthless and doesn’t matter.

Three was their missiles. Now DT says other countries have them, why not Iran. Fuckin’ A!

Four was the liberation of the Iranian people from their tyrannical government. The only one who believed that was the Shah’s idiot son. There is no plausible scenario wherein bombing a nation empowers its people to overthrow their government.

Five was the money. Remember when the Rs were screaming about Obama giving Iran money? Of course it was their money, previously frozen. Now Trump admits it is their money. Moreover, there is the talk about over $300 billion in funding for reconstruction. We should wonder who else will get a taste of that.

Like the blind warthog who finds an acorn, the intrinsic infeasibility of the U.S./Israeli attack, combined with approaching midterms in the U.S., has pushed the Mango Mussolini towards the light. Anyone who obstructs this progress is unworthy of respect, not to mention political support.

For example, the bright Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy, one of the Democrats’ foreign policy mavens, has the clever stance of simultaneously pointing out that the war was a bad idea (true), and it accomplished nothing, as if more ought to have been accomplished.

We are not quite out of the woods on all this. Israel isn’t quitting Lebanon, so the fat man isn’t singing.