Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Welzer's avatar

We both knew this at Rutgers at age 20:

The United States is the most dominant imperial power in history. Its wealth/power elites maintain its position (and their position) acting through two political parties and a duopolistic electoral system. Among those elites there are differing ideas about the most effective orientation. The two parties reflect that. A conservative wing of the bourgeoisie advocates for implementing policies that are straightforwardly nationalistic, pro-market, and pro-wealth accumulation. The Republican Party is their vehicle. A liberal wing thinks it’s wiser to foster stability through geopolitical alliance relations and, domestically, through placation of the masses via the welfare-statist policies of the Democratic Party.

There are continual debates “at the top” about these differing orientations. The elites compete in trying to disseminate more appealing messaging to the masses. Neither seems to “win out” long-term. For over 150 years the Republicans and Democrats have traded place in regard to presidential administrations. For over 150 years our national legislature has been about evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats. So those parties obviously are responsible for the state of things . . . the obscene levels of inequality, the militarism, inadequate housing and healthcare coverage, the unfair taxation system, political dominance by the mega-corporations, destruction of ecological habitat, the climate chaos, the withering of local community life. That’s the essential status quo and it doesn’t change all so much under the jurisdiction of one party or the other. They are both creatures of hypermodern industrial capitalism. That extant status quo is unsatisfactory for the masses of people; they express dissatisfaction by voting out the incumbents on a regular basis, so we see oscillating administration of the system. At one time the Republicans were a little better. Nowadays the Democrats are a little better. Sure, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and Trump were “the greater evil,” but, really, not by all so much relatively, in regard to the systemic essentials.

There will be a breakthrough point after which our electoral system will open up. From what happened with Perot you can see how it can happen. This year Kennedy could have advanced from 15% support to 20% support and made a significant impact. We should be laying the groundwork for true multi-party democracy rather than continuing to foster delusions about the Democratic Party, rather than continuing to suffer disappointment decade after decade.

Expand full comment
Steve Welzer's avatar

“If class politics is over, I really don’t know where to go.”

Right.

Something happened, Max. It happened during the ’80s.

I’ve gone through two major head changes. Like you, I grew up a middle-class Jewish kid in the suburbs who believed in the American Dream. My becoming a Marxist in college was a head change that upset my whole family.

But I started reading Murray Bookchin during the 1980s. Over a period of ten years I went through a second really major head change: from Red to Green.

Marxism is wrong in its fundamentals and just doesn’t conform to reality. So it leads its adherents into a dead-end: “I really don’t know where to go.”

Here’s where to go:

https://discussion.dsausa.org/t/what-ever-happened-to-the-peoples-party/37270/7

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts