Discussion about this post

User's avatar
paul wolfson's avatar

RE: the slogan, "There is no way to democratic socialism. Democratic socialism is the way,” Nope!

Much better is, "There is no way to democratic socialism. Social democracy is the way.”

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In other matters, do you read Branco Milanovic's blog, "Global Inequality and More?" ICYMI, this book review is of interest:

https://branko2f7.substack.com/p/poison-for-the-soul

I have recently finished his book on the history of inequality in economic analysis as well as the book reviewed in the link above, which examines the history of inequality in political theory. Both include chapters on Marx, which I found illuminating. According to both, Marx is not an egalitarian. In the book reviewed at the link, the argument is that Marx is a classical republican, drawing on a long history of republican political theory -- back to Plato -- which concerns itself with the effects of socio-economic inequality on the polity and its citizens. That is, an egalitarian distribution of wealth and income is desirable not at all for its own sake but, to the extent it is desirable, it is only because it makes possible the attainment of other goals.

Expand full comment
Steve Welzer's avatar

The socialist movement is now 200 years old. There has not been a single enduringly successful implementation of the full vision (social ownership and democratic control of society’s major means of production).

Bernsteinism is now well over 100 years old. It could hardly be less inspiring.

Instead of getting all old-fogey, here’s where Sixties radicalism should have gone:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F254HFVT/ref=sr_1_1

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts