5 Comments

Don't forget the CCP, with 95 million members at present. The Efurt program would not have helped them much, with over 90% peasants in a semi-colonial and semi-feudal order, with works only 2%. But they figured out protracted people's war and islands of 'new democracy' in liberated zones, a strategy to get them to power in 1949. Then afterwards, a complex class struggle to develop the country, still going on. But the CCP keeps its grip leading the way.

Expand full comment

Well-taken. See my next post. To me the PRC doesn't fit Marx's historical theory. I need to learn more about it. To the best of my knowledge, colonial revolts were led by Marxists but did not much reflect Marx in terms of content or subsequent development in power. I suspect if more colonial revolutions had followed the Chinese model more closely, the world would be a very different place.

Expand full comment

Vietnam probably comes close to the Chinese approach. Laos and the DPRK are special cases. Then we have Cuba. But taking a different path, and an electoral one, we now have Nepal and Sri Lanka, with Marxist parties in power, facing non-European realities.

Expand full comment

ML orgs still can kick ass

Expand full comment

The continued operation of artisan production inside the transactional market place

Requires a firm grip

On the durability yes tenacity

Of petite bourgeois culture

Even when total sublation exists

At the technical level

At the foundation of it all

Transactional markets themselves

Are booming away

In once red china

Long since October led on

to the first 5 year plan

Us devotees of Diamatics

Are hardly surprised by that

Marx or Mao wouldn't be either

Beware

Recipes for

Cook shops of the future

Expand full comment