A word on Stoller. He's on the side of the angels, but he tends to swing from the heels. For instance, he frequently conflates the microeconomic problem of mono/oligopoly with the macroeconomic problem of inflation. He's worth reading since he indeed covers his beat thoroughly, but skepticism is required, especially with his inferences.
A word on Stoller. He's on the side of the angels, but he tends to swing from the heels. For instance, he frequently conflates the microeconomic problem of mono/oligopoly with the macroeconomic problem of inflation. He's worth reading since he indeed covers his beat thoroughly, but skepticism is required, especially with his inferences.
Yes. One must recognize
A humn operating with limited
Know what and know how
Political economics
Requires surgery
Performed by well meaning
Over confident lumber jacks
May not be whats called for
If enough voters consider
unscruplous agents
better for
the national job at hand *
Most dont need additional evidence
However as you imply
Wavering days are never over
At the margins the question
" is rhe difference worth the bother "
Remains open for
Red or blue to deliver
"The More effective closure"
Note to blues
Forget scrupples in the gun lap.
* the white christion nation
And their faithful POC flunkees